Dear Editor,
Abu Bakr, in his letter to SN on December 20 (‘What is it that Mr Corbin’s detractors want?’), touches on a matter that needs greater ventilation in the ‘Great Guyana Debate.’ He makes reference to colonial immigration policy and how it has placed the PNCR at an inherent electoral disadvantage. In plain words, Mr Bakr is saying that the large numbers of indentured labourers imported from India to colonial Guyana have fortuitously led to an Indo-Guyanese numerical advantage.
There’s an additional factor to consider. Guyana’s history (even before the 1960s) is littered with incidents of racial tension, conflict and clashes, many of which were triggered by the colonial strategy of divide-and-rule. From our early history, therefore, racial identity and group consciousness were firmly entrenched. By the onset of race-based politics in Guyana in 1950s, Jagan’s PPP had inherited from our colonial history not only an Indian numerical superiority, but also a group of people who were cohesive and racially-conscious.
The reasons therefore why the electoral mathematics favours the PPP has little to do with the party’s political skills or strategy. It had mostly to do with decisions made in London, in the local legislature and mansions of colonial governors and sugar barons. The point is that the quirks of our colonial past cannot be legitimate grounds to keep any group in Guyana out of political power, unrepresented in the highest national decision-making forums. And the longer elections in Guyana remain nothing more than an ethnic census, the more one-party rule becomes unjustifiable.
The predicament that some in the PNCR leadership may face is they assume that in asking for power-sharing they are asking the PPP for a donation. As such, they are easily discomforted if accused of seeking power through the back door, or if told that the PNCR can never win an election. The PNCR and others have to be convinced that the call for power-sharing is a just call for a level playing field for all Guyanese, a playing field made uneven by the decisions of our colonial masters, a playing field that has unfairly given one group exclusive rights to something that belongs to all Guyanese.
This is not an argument to deny Indo-Guyanese their due. It is another justification for a new political system in Guyana, one in which all Guyanese can meaningfully participate.
Yours faithfully,
G. Nurse
