Bomber’s betrayal shows spy challenge for West

LONDON, (Reuters) – The killing of CIA employees in  Afghanistan by a suicide bomber lauded online as a militant  James Bond suggests al Qaeda’s south Asian allies have developed  an unprecedented capacity to disrupt the West’s spy efforts.

The attack by a Jordanian double agent also shows militants  are keener on killing Western spies than infiltrating them,  underlining the daunting challenge for Western services seeking  to plant an informant among al Qaeda’s senior ranks.

The agent, Humam Khalil Abu Mulal al-Balawi, blew himself up  on Dec. 30 inside Forward Operating Base Chapman, a  well-fortified U.S. compound in Khost province in southeast  Afghanistan, killing seven CIA officers and a Jordanian officer.

The attack, the second-most deadly in CIA history, pleased a  global community of al Qaeda propagandists thrilled to discover  Balawi was the author under a pen name of some of the most  celebrated anti-Western commentaries on the Internet.

“Our James Bond — who is he? He is Abu Dujana! His motto:  Let me die or live free!” Qaeda supporter Asadullah Alshishani  wrote in one posting, referring to Balawi’s online pen name.

The attack followed the failed Dec. 25 downing of a U.S.  airliner over Detroit, the Nov. 5 killing of 13 at a U.S. army  base by a gunman linked to a Yemen-based preacher and a string  of arrests of suspected militants in the United States in 2009.

Counter-terrorism experts say the incidents show the  resilience of the globally-scattered hubs of sympathisers,  financiers and supporters that Osama bin Laden has fostered as  he has come under increasing pressure from U.S. drone attacks in  South Asia, where he is believed to be hiding.

Investigators are studying possible links between the Dec.  30 attack and at least two local al Qaeda allies — Pakistan’s  own Taliban insurgents and the Haqqani network associated with  the Afghan Taliban group fighting U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

A spate of militant propaganda about the attack has only  intensified this focus.

Al-Jazeera television reported that shortly before his  suicide attack Balawi had made a video urging revenge for the  death of the Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud, killed  by a pilotless U.S. aircraft last year.

Pakistan television station AAJ showed what it said was a  video of Balawi sitting with Baitullah’s successor, Pakistani  Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud, and reported he shared U.S.  and Jordanian state secrets with militants.

“The attack and the statements being made about it show that  links to local partners are at the very core of al Qaeda’s  mission,” said Brynjar Lia, a research professor at the  Norwegian Defence Research Establishment.

“If al Qaeda had not ingratiated itself with local groups it  would have exposed itself to grave dangers,” he said, in a  reference to the dependence of al Qaeda’s mostly Arab leaders on  their more militarily powerful south Asian hosts for security.

Former intelligence officials have said Balawi was recruited  by Jordanian intelligence to infiltrate al Qaeda and the Taliban  and give Washington an intelligence advantage it has sought with  special urgency since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

Balawi had associated with Islamists in the past, but U.S.  and Jordanian spy agencies believed he had been successfully  “de-radicalised”.

Analysts said it appeared the CIA understandably hoped he  might be someone with the credibility, savvy and boldness to  infiltrate senior al Qaeda ranks and operate undetected.

But the agency’s desire for a well-placed agent may have led  it to cut corners on security, some commentators have said.

QAEDA SEEKS A “DEATH BLOW”

A Western counter-terrorism official said the attack had  shown that al Qaeda “is not playing an intelligence game, which  would have meant keeping its man alive in our system. It’s at  war, and it wants to deal a death blow.

“We are the ones playing the intel game. Were we so  desperate for a major breakthrough with that effort that we got  carried away?”

CIA Director Leon Panetta denied there had been complacency.      “This was not a question of trusting a potential  intelligence asset, even one who had provided information that  we could verify independently. It is never that simple, and no  one ignored the hazards,” he wrote in the Washington Post.

“The individual was about to be searched by our security  officers – a distance away from other intelligence personnel –  when he set off his explosives.”

The West’s need for sources is likely to ensure that Western  intelligence maintains its ties to Jordan, analysts said. “If the Jordanians are as good as we think they are, the  U.S. would be mad to sever the relationship,” former U.S,  intelligence officer Robert Ayers told Reuters.