Controversy mounts in EU over fall-out from biofuel

One leaked document from the EU’s executive, the European  Commission, suggests biofuel from palm oil might get a boost  from new environmental criteria under development.

But another contains a warning from a top official that  taking full account of the carbon footprint of biofuels might  “kill” an EU industry with annual revenues of around $5 billion.

The European Union aims to get a tenth of its road fuels  from renewable sources by the end of this decade, but has met  with criticism that biofuels can force up food prices and do  more harm than good in the fight against climate change.

Most of the 10 percent goal will be met through biofuels,  creating a market coveted by EU farming nations, which produce  about 10 billion litres a year, as well as exporters such as  Brazil, Malaysia and Indonesia.

Environmentalists say biofuels made from grains and oilseeds  are forcing farmers to expand agricultural land by hacking into  rainforests and draining wetlands — known as “indirect land-use  change” (ILUC).

Clearing and burning forests puts vast quantities of carbon  emissions into the atmosphere, so the EU risks promoting damage  to the climate by creating such a valuable market.

To counter that risk, strict environmental criteria have  been put in place.

The European Commission has also been looking at introducing  new rules to curb the impact of ILUC, but its progress had been  complicated by conflicting opinions among specialists on trade,  agriculture, energy and environment.