Obama pushes bank reform, lashes out at Republicans

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – US President Barack  Obama accused opposition Republicans yesterday of spreading  misinformation about a Democratic bill that aims to tighten  oversight of Wall Street banks and their practices.

With debate heating up in Washington about reforming the  financial rules, regulators charged Wall Street giant Goldman  Sachs with fraud on Friday.

Bank shares and the broader stock market fell on fears the  civil lawsuit could make it more difficult for the financial  industry to ward off reform.

After successfully shepherding his healthcare overhaul  through Congress, Obama is pushing for victory on the financial  regulatory reforms — a popular issue with voters in the run-up  to congressional elections in November after a financial  meltdown sparked the worst US recession in decades.

The Senate is expected to vote within weeks on the reform  bill, which Obama said would “hold Wall Street accountable” and  put rules in place to prevent any more taxpayer-funded bailouts  of companies in trouble.

“Never again will taxpayers be on the hook because a  financial company is deemed ‘too big to fail,‘“ Obama said in  his weekly radio and Internet address.

Under the controversial Troubled Asset Relief Program  launched by the Bush administration, $700 billion was set aside  to help major financial firms and automakers, including AIG,  Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and  Goldman Sachs.

Republicans insist the Democratic bill will lead to more  taxpayer-funded bailouts and say it establishes new regulatory  powers that will stifle small businesses and community banks.

All 41 Republicans in the 100-seat Senate expressed their  opposition to the bill in a letter on Friday but said they were  willing to work with Democrats on the issue.

Obama said he still hoped to win Republican support for the  bill but lashed out at Republican Senate leader Mitch  McConnell, accusing him of making a “cynical and deceptive  assertion that reform would somehow enable future bailouts —  when he knows that it would do just the opposite.”