WASHINGTON, (Reuters) – President Barack Obama fired his top Afghanistan commander yesterday over inflammatory comments that enraged the White House, and vowed not to let the military shake-up undermine the U.S. war effort.
In an extraordinary turn of events, Obama called General Stanley McChrystal on the carpet at the White House, relieved him of command and replaced him with his boss, General David Petraeus, architect of the Iraq war turnaround. Obama had summoned McChrystal from Afghanistan to answer for remarks he and his aides made in an explosive Rolling Stone magazine article that disparaged the president and other civilian leaders.
“The conduct represented in the recently published article does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general,” Obama said bluntly in the White House Rose Garden as he announced McChrystal’s dismissal.
“It undermines the civilian control of the military that is at the core of our democratic system. And it erodes the trust that’s necessary for our team to work together to achieve our objectives in Afghanistan,” he said.
The situation posed a dilemma for Obama. If McChrystal had kept his job, the president could have been seen as tolerating insubordination. By firing him, Obama opted instead for the risk involved in shaking up the chain of command at a perilous moment in the unpopular nine-year-old war.
Obama said McChrystal’s dismissal was needed to safeguard the unity of the war effort but insisted the switch in generals was a “change in personnel but it is not a change in policy.”
There have been increasing doubts among U.S. lawmakers about Obama’s six-month-old troop buildup strategy against a resurgent Taliban, and some critics are skeptical of Obama’s pledge to start bringing U.S. forces home by July 2011.
Seeking to underscore the continuity of command and counter any concerns about a disruption in war leadership, Obama had Petraeus by his side for the announcement.
Petraeus, as commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, was widely credited with turning the tide when sectarian violence there verged on civil war. He has a strong following on Capitol Hill and swift Senate confirmation is expected.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who has a close bond with McChrystal and had hoped he would stay on, respected Obama’s decision to dismiss him, a spokesman said.
Obama spoke to Karzai and British Prime Minister David Cameron, a key ally in Afghanistan, about the change. The episode evoked memories of military-civilian tensions when President Harry Truman summoned General Douglas MacArthur for a dressing-down and stripped him of his Far East command in 1951 for flouting U.S. policy and openly advocating expansion of the Korean conflict to China.
McChrystal, the U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan and an architect of Obama’s war strategy, entered the White House through a side door for his encounter with Obama, who accepted his letter of resignation during a 30-minute meeting.
Underscoring Obama’s displeasure over the McChrystal incident, he then delivered a “stern” lecture to his national security team, ordering them to stop petty bickering and forge unity, a senior administration official.
Aides had described Obama as furious about McChrystal’s contemptuous remarks in the article, but he said in his Rose Garden appearance he was not acting out of a feeling of personal insult.
With his career on the line, the 55-year-old general had apologized on Tuesday, calling it a “mistake reflecting poor judgment.”
As Obama was speaking, McChrystal released a terse statement saying he had resigned out of “a desire to see the mission succeed.”
Lieutenant-General David Rodriguez, McChrystal’s No. 2, was named acting commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, and British Lieutenant-General Nick Parker will serve as acting head of NATO forces in Afghanistan until Petraeus takes over, U.S. officials said.
