BEIJING (Reuters) – Beijing yesterday cancelled a meeting with a Norwegian minister as Chinese officials bristled over the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to jailed dissident Liu Xiaobo. Responses to the prize have laid bare tensions between Bejing and its critics at a time of greater Chinese assertiveness over its currency, international trade and even geographical ambitions for territory in dispute with its neighbours.
State-controlled Chinese newspapers said the prize to Liu, once reviled by Beijing as a traitorous “black hand” behind the 1989 Tiananmen pro-democracy protests, showed a prejudiced West afraid of China’s rising wealth and standing.
China’s Foreign Ministry had already called the prize an “obscenity” and blamed the Norwegian government, although Oslo has no say in who the Oslo-based Nobel committee awards it to.
Liu, serving 11 years in jail for campaigning for the democratic transformation of China’s one-party state, told his wife, Liu Xia, that the award was a tribute to citizens killed when troops moved in to crush the protests, reports said yesterday.
Although a final toll may never be known, estimates of those killed range from several hundred to several thousand. China insists the reports are exaggerated.
“This prize goes to all of those who died on June 4, 1989,” he told her, according to Norway’s Dagbladet newspaper, citing a message from Liu Xia after she visited him in prison.
Liu Xia also said she had been “put under house arrest”, the Dagbladet reported, and Liu’s lawyer, Shang Baojun, told Reuters that he had been unable to contact her.
Diplomats from the European Union as well as Australia and Switzerland unsuccessfully tried to visit Liu Xia in her apartment yesterday but were stopped by a plain clothes official who said he worked for the apartment compound.
Chinese media reacted furiously yesterday to the Nobel Prize decision. If Liu’s calls for a multi-party democracy in China were followed, said the Global Times, a popular Chinese-language tabloid: “China’s fate would perhaps be no better than the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, and the country probably would have quickly collapsed.”