LONDON, (Reuters) – Three Pakistan cricketers, accused of taking bribes to fix parts of a test match in England last year, told police the incidents were coincidental or bad luck, a London court heard yesterday.
The trio, former captain Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir, are accused by British prosecutors of spot-fixing or rigging the match by bowling no-balls at pre-agreed times during the fourth test at Lord’s last August.
“There is no doubt that the allegations are very serious. I know you understand that,” Judge Howard Riddle told the men at a hearing at London’s Westminster Magistrates’ court. Along with a fourth man, sporting agent Mazhar Majeed, the three players, who appeared in court wearing dark suits and dark open-necked shirts, face charges of conspiracy to obtain and accept corrupt payments, and conspiracy to cheat.
Prosecutor Sally Walsh told the court Butt and Amir had said in police interviews that money which had been found was from appearances at an ice-cream parlour owned by Majeed. Butt told detectives the no-balls were coincidental and Amir said they were the result of bad luck because the ground had been slippery, Walsh said.
The men were ordered to appear again at London’s Southwark Crown Court on May 20 and were given unconditional bail, while Majeed was ordered to surrender his passport.
Riddle said, while Britain had no extradition treaty with Pakistan, any failure to show up for future court hearings would end their careers.
“Failing to attend these proceedings will destroy playing international cricket in the future,” he said, describing the men as being of good character.
“Their reputation is of the utmost importance. They have a very strong incentive to attend trial and to defend this.”
LENGTHY BANS
In addition to the criminal case, the men have been given lengthy bans after having been found guilty of corruption by the International Cricket Council.
They have all lodged appeals against the bans with the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Amir’s lawyer Gareth Peirce said her client had had to deal with problems with British immigration in order to attend Thursday’s hearing.