LONDON, (Reuters) – Britain and the United States rejected calls from China and Russia for greater Internet controls yesterday at the opening of a major cyberspace conference, but Western states faced accusations of double standards.
Ministers, tech executives and Internet activists are meeting over two days in London to discuss how to tackle security threats and crime on the Internet without stifling economic opportunities or freedom of speech.
While Western states worry about intellectual property theft and hacking, authoritarian governments are alarmed at the role the Inter-net and social media played in the protests that swept the Arab world this year.
“Too many states around the world are seeking to go beyond legitimate interference or disagree with us about what constitutes ‘legitimate’ behaviour,” Foreign Secretary William Hague told the meeting.
“We saw in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya that cutting off the Internet, blocking Facebook, jamming Al Jazeera, intimidating journalists and imprisoning bloggers does not create stability or make grievances go away … The idea of freedom cannot be contained behind bars, no matter how strong the lock.”
In September, China, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan proposed to the United Nations a global code of conduct including the principle that “policy authority for Internet-related public issues is the sovereign right of states”.
Cyber security experts say western states hoped to fend off Russian, Chinese and other calls for a “cyber treaty” and to prompt those states to rein in hackers.
On the eve of the conference, the head of Britain’s communications spy agency said UK government and industry computer systems faced a “disturbing” number of cyber attacks, including a serious assault on the Foreign Office’s network. .
Speaking by videoconference after U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pulled out citing her mother’s health problems, Vice President Joe Biden said states and others needed to make sure they followed existing laws when it came to cyberspace.
“The Internet represents and presents new challenges but to resolve them we don’t need to start from scratch,” he said. “International law principles are not suspended in cyberspace. They apply there … with equal force and equal urgency.”
He said a desire for greater security did not mean that the civil liberties should simply be ignored.
“The tactic of invoking security as a justification for harsh crackdowns on freedom is not new in the digital age,” he said. “But it has new resonance as the internet has given governments new capacities for tracking and punishing human rights advocates and political dissidents.”
