UN nuclear watchdog board rebukes defiant Iran

VIENNA, (Reuters) – The U.N. nuclear watchdog  board censured Iran yesterday over mounting suspicions it is  trying to develop nuclear weapons, but Tehran said the move  would only
strengthen its determination to press on with  sensitive work.

Almost unanimously, the agency’s 35-nation board passed a  resolution expressing “increasing concern” about Iran’s nuclear  programme, after a U.N. report last week said the Islamic state  appeared to have worked on designing an atom bomb.

“Iran will not bow to pressure,” said Ali Asghar Soltanieh,  Iran’s envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

In a further sign of Tehran’s worsening ties with the U.N.  body, he said Iran would boycott rare Middle East nuclear talks  hosted by the IAEA next week.
In Washington, White House press secretary Jay Carney said  the resolution exposed the “hollowness of Iran’s claims” that  its nuclear programme is purely peaceful. The United States  would continue to pressure Tehran, including through sanctions.

“The whole world now knows that Iran not only sought to hide  its uranium enrichment program from the world for more than two  decades, but also engaged in covert research and development  related to activities that can have only one application:  building a nuclear warhead,” he said.

But the compromise text – adopted by 32 votes for and only  Cuba and Ecuador against – omitted any concrete punitive steps,  reflecting Russian and Chinese opposition to cornering Iran.  Indonesia abstained in the vote.

Moscow’s and Beijing’s reluctance to further punish Iran, a  major oil producer, makes clear Western states will have to act  on their own if they want to tighten sanctions on the country.

That in turn is likely to disappoint Israel, which has not  ruled out military action against its arch-foe if diplomatic  means fail to stop a nuclear programme which the Jewish state  sees as an existential threat.

Last week’s IAEA report presented a stash of intelligence  indicating that Iran has undertaken research and experiments  geared to developing a nuclear weapons capability. It has stoked  tensions in the Middle East and redoubled calls in Western  capitals for stiffer sanctions against Tehran.

Iran showed no sign of backing down in the protracted  dispute over its atomic activities, threatening to take legal  action against the Vienna-based U.N. agency for issuing the  hard-hitting report about Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Iran says it is enriching uranium only as fuel for nuclear  power plants, not atomic weapons. It has dismissed the details  in the IAEA report, obtained mainly from Western spy agencies,  as fabricated, and accuses the IAEA of a pro-Western slant.

      BIG POWER DIVISIONS

Iran considers the IAEA report “unprofessional, unbalanced,  illegal and politicised”, Soltanieh told the board meeting  before the vote, the second against Iran in as many years.

The IAEA resolution’s “only immediate effect is a further  strengthening” of Iran’s determination to continue its nuclear  activities, he later told reporters.
“We will not suspend our enrichment activities and our work  for even a second,” Soltanieh added.

The six powers spearheading diplomacy on Iran – the United  States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany – this week  ironed out the resolution in intense talks and submitted it to  the board, a mix of industrialised and developing countries.

It will not placate those in the West and in Israel who had  hoped Amano’s report would bring about tough international  action to corral Tehran.

“At this point, it doesn’t really ratchet up the pressure on  Iran,” said proliferation expert Mark Hibbs of the Carnegie  Endowment for International Peace.

But the broad support for the text, including votes in  favour from emerging political and economic powers India, Brazil  and South Africa, may worry Iran.

With several rounds of nuclear talks having led nowhere,  failing even to agree an agenda, the Security Council has  imposed four rounds of sanctions on Iran since 2006. But Moscow  and Beijing, with hefty trade and energy stakes in Iran, have  made clear their opposition to more such steps.