I’ve had the good fortune lately to do one of the things I enjoy the most – browse in good bookstores and buy a stock of books to read and add to my library. I cannot think of a more peaceful, pleasurable, and satisfying occupation.
Once, employed in this lovely pursuit, I found waiting for me over the years, among the usual multitude of treasures the Oxford University Press edition of Alexander Herzen’s memoirs. Friends whom I greatly respect had told me about Herzen’s classic quality but until then I had not read anything by him. I soon found that his memoirs are among the greatest and most stimulating books I have ever read.
Alexander Herzen (1812-70) is known as the founder of Russian socialism and the greatest opponent in his time of Czarist autocracy, and I suppose he is studied by political scientists and historians for that reason. But in his memoirs, for me anyway, he eludes all political classification and simply becomes a superbly inspiring, original, and thought-provoking writer. I have found myself page after page letting his book fall for a moment to think about what Herzen has written – letting the insights and the truth sink in before reading on expectantly.
Let me give one small example of this. Throughout his memoirs Herzen insists again and again that to look at the end and not the action itself is a cardinal error in life. At every point man must achieve what he can achieve, must be the best he can be, in that moment. So when Herzen writes about his childhood he says something which we adults too often forget in the lives of our own children:
“We think that the purpose of the child is to grow up because it does grow up. But its purpose is to play, to enjoy itself, to be a child. If we merely look to the end of the process, the purpose of all life is death.”
On page after page Herzen makes you think “Yes, that’s true, I must remember that.” I wish I had read his book when I was a young man. I wish everybody could read him.
With political activity taking centre-stage in Guyana at present, it is Herzen’s political perceptions that may be of most immediate interest. Every politician should read Herzen’s memoirs and the brilliant essay by the English philosopher Isaiah Berlin which introduces the book. (By the way they should also read George Orwell’s great essay ‘Politics and the English Language’).
Herzen believes that men and women are not simple enough, human lives and relationships are too complex, for the standard formulas and neat solutions beloved of politicians. Attempts to fit people and their aspirations into generalized rational schemes, conceived in terms of theoretical ideals – however high-minded the motive – inevitably lead to a terrible maiming of human beings. The process always culminates in the benefit of a few only at the expense of the majority.
Every person now with access to political power in Guyana might read a lesson in Herzen’s views expressed so passionately on the side of the precious individuality of men and women. He loathed ideological and political abstractions with their terrifying power over human lives. He hated the despotism of formulas which inevitably focus on “sacrifices today, the fruits tomorrow.” He fervently believed, for instance, that the purpose of any struggle for liberty is not for liberty tomorrow, it is liberty today, the liberty of living individuals with individual purposes sacred to them. Immediate human demands must never be abandoned in the name of abstractions, fanatical generalizations, stereotyped categorizations of people, empty sound-bites, idealized sets of words.
One day the great French socialist Louis Blanc observed to Herzen that human life was a great social duty, that man must always sacrifice himself to society.
“Why”, I asked suddenly.
“How do you mean ‘Why?’ he said, “But surely the whole purpose and mission of man is the well-being of society?”
“But it will never be attained if everyone makes sacrifices and nobody enjoys himself”.
“You are playing with words”.
“The muddle-headedness of a barbarian,” I replied laughing.
In this jovial and apparently causal passage Herzen embodies his central principle – that the goal of life is life itself, that to sacrifice the present to some vague and unpredictable future is a form of delusion which leads to the destruction of all that alone is valuable in men and societies – leads to the sacrifice of the flesh and blood of live human beings on the altar of idealized abstractions.
All the political actors in our nation should be looking for the spirit of Alexander Herzen. Even more importantly, we must all hope that the actions of those who are now in touch with political power are informed by the wonderful humanity expressed by Alexander Herzen in his memoirs written 160 years ago but true for any age in any country.
