NEW DELHI, (Reuters) – The very thought of
Sachin Tendulkar and his contemporaries being shown the exit
door would have been dismissed a year ago, but the majority of
the Indian cricket fans are now convinced that the ‘golden
generation’ should make way for new blood.
After a decade-and-a-half of blind worship, fans believe
their demigods have been rendered immobile by feet of clay and
are ready to thank them for the memories and move on.
The last time Tendulkar featured in a newspaper poll was
when readers were asked who should be the first sportsperson to
receive India’s highest civilian award, a Bharat Ratna.
As India succumbed to their second straight overseas
whitewash in Australia, the Hindustan Times newspaper carried a
poll this weekend in which more than 36 percent opined the
38-year-old ‘Little Master’ should hang up his bat.
Quite a significant percentage, considering the man in
question has virtually been the sacred cow of Indian cricket
since his first test century in 1990.
The results were even worse for the two stalwarts Tendulkar
sits sandwiched between in the batting order.
More than 58 percent favoured 39-year-old Rahul Dravid’s
immediate departure while 82.6 percent would prefer not to see
VVS Laxman (38) in India colours again.
“Age is conspiring against them,” former test player Ravi
Shastri wrote in a column that appeared in Sunday’s Times of
India newspaper.
“A bad series or two at the start of your career is almost a
given. A series or two at the end is a catastrophe. Everyone is
in an unforgiving mood.”
From India’s perspective, the Australia tour was a disaster,
where anything that could go possibly wrong invariably did.
The biggest letdown was the vaunted batting order where
Tendulkar, Dravid and Laxman – who have more than 37,500 test
runs between them – made a collective contribution of 636 runs
in the four-test series.
Dravid, who alone had scored 619 in the drawn 2003-04
series, managed just 194 runs at an average of fewer than 25 per
innings.
His legendary defence, that earned him the moniker of “The
Wall”, was breached seven times in eight innings, including by a
Peter Siddle no-ball in Melbourne.
TIMID SELECTORS
Some other hard-earned reputations were also sullied.
Laxman was a pale imitation of the batsman who has been
Australia’s nemesis for so long and scratched around for his 155
runs from eight innings to finish with an embarrassing sub-20
average.
Only Tendulkar averaged 35-plus in the series and regularly
middled the ball, but his desperate bid for a 100th
international century seems to have become a millstone around
the neck of cricket’s most prolific batsman.
Almost inevitably, India hurtled from one defeat to another
and many believe the humiliation could have been easily averted
had the selectors shrugged off their timidity and took a
long-term view of things.
“I can understand the fans being in awe of big names. But
sometimes the selectors and officials are also too much in awe
of the big names and that’s why not able to take tough
decisions,” former test player Sanjay Manjrekar told CNN-IBN
channel.
His views were echoed by former Australia captain Ian
Chappell, who recommended a thorough review of Indian cricket.
“The star system is well and truly ingrained in the Indian
team and things won’t improve, certainly not on the overseas
test match front, until this is changed,” Chappell wrote in a
column that appeared in Sunday’s Hindustan Times.
“India is currently a side full of individually bright stars
and it needs to become a group of cricketers who perform as a
team. It doesn’t help when a number of those individually bright
stars are playing for their own survival.
“… the star players have held sway for too long and surely
eight successive losses, some of them total capitulation, is
confirmation that the system is not working,” Chappell added.
To make it work again, the Indian cricket board has no other
choice but to confront the transitional crisis they have been
avoiding for too long and their task has been made easier by the
fact they finally have the country’s fans on the same page.
