T&T bound by law to accept CCJ —Sir Dennis

By Staff Editor On In Guyana News |
President of the Caribbean Court of Justice Sir Dennis Byron, second from left, chats with Justice Rolston Nelson, left, Justice Jacob Wit and Justice Adrian Dudley Saunders, during a breakfast meeting held at the CCJ headquarters on Henry Street, Port-of-Spain, on Tuesday. (Trinidad Guardian photo)
President of the Caribbean Court of Justice Sir Dennis Byron, second from left, chats with Justice Rolston Nelson, left, Justice Jacob Wit and Justice Adrian Dudley Saunders, during a breakfast meeting held at the CCJ headquarters on Henry Street, Port-of-Spain, on Tuesday. (Trinidad Guardian photo)

(Trinidad Guardian) Trinidad and Tobago is bound by international law to make the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) its final court of appeal. These were the words of President of the CCJ Sir Dennis Byron, on Tuesday while addressing a media breakfast meeting at the CCJ’s Henry Street, Port-of-Spain, headquarters.

Byron said: “It would not cost more money to accede to having the CCJ as the final appellate court. Countries who have not acceded as yet are not benefiting as fully as they could.” An optimistic Justice Dennis noted, however, that the judges of the CCJ were sure that several other Caricom members would accede in the near future.

President of the Caribbean Court of Justice Sir Dennis Byron, second from left, chats with Justice Rolston Nelson, left, Justice Jacob Wit and Justice Adrian Dudley Saunders, during a breakfast meeting held at the CCJ headquarters on Henry Street, Port-of-Spain, on Tuesday. (Trinidad Guardian photo)
President of the Caribbean Court of Justice Sir Dennis Byron, second from left, chats with Justice Rolston Nelson, left, Justice Jacob Wit and Justice Adrian Dudley Saunders, during a breakfast meeting held at the CCJ headquarters on Henry Street, Port-of-Spain, on Tuesday. (Trinidad Guardian photo)

Under international law, treaties between countries are upheld through goodwill between them, he said. Of the 12 Caricom nations who initially signed the agreement establishing the court in 2001, only three have acceded to make it their final appellate court. They are Barbados, Guyana and, most recently, Belize.

The court was later inaugurated in 2005 with seven presiding judges, with former Chief Justice Michael de la Bastide being appointed its first president. Sir Dennis also said that Privy Council judges, who at present adjudicate on appeals for the other nine nations, have expressed the view that Caricom nations should instead use the CCJ.

“The CCJ seeks to improve, build upon and develop Caribbean jurisprudence,” Byron said. He further stated that for complete independence, the members states would need to “completely manage their jurisprudence.” CCJ judge Rolston Nelson, who also spoke at the event yesterday, expressed similar sentiments as Justice Byron.

Nelson, a Trinidadian, suggested that the delay in acceding to the CCJ may be political. “There is a parliamentary hurdle in many countries,” he said. “For example in T&T, a three-quarters majority in the House of Representatives and a two-third majority in the Senate is needed to accede to the CCJ.”

Also attending Tuesday’s meeting was Justices Adrian Saunders and Jacob Wit. Although critisising the delay in accepting the CCJ, Justices Byron and Nelson both noted that T&T had contributed the most among the 12 member-states with an initial contribution to the court’s creation of US$26 million.

Trinidad and Tobago also pays the rent for the building in Port-of-Spain that houses the CCJ’s courtroom, offices and support staff, Nelson said. Byron explained that the court was run by interest earned from a US$100 million trust fund which was established by the member states at the CCJ’s creation.

Asked if issues of bias and discrimination were present in the selection of judges who sit in the CCJ, all four judges dismissed the claims, saying that the CCJ was a model for other international courts around the world. Wit explained that the selection of judges was made by an 11-member commission comprising of independent officials from the various member states.

 

Wit, who was born in the Netherlands, said that the selection of judicial officers was done on merit and allows for foreign nationals, such as himself who qualified for the posts.