JOHANNESBURG, (Reuters) – South African President Jacob Zuma yesterday denied acting dishonestly in a scandal over improper state spending at his private home, after a scathing court ruling prompted calls for him to resign.
The scandal is arguably the biggest yet to hit Zuma, who has fended off accusations of corruption, influence peddling and even rape since before he took office in 2009. It comes ahead of local elections that could see the ruling African National Congress (ANC) lose support.
South Africa’s top court on Thursday held that Zuma had failed to uphold the constitution by ignoring instructions to pay back some of the $16 million in state funds spent on renovations at his sprawling residence at Nkandla.
In a televised address to the nation last evening, an apparently contrite Zuma apologised and said he would pay back some of the money, as ordered.
A report in 2014 identified a swimming pool, cattle enclosure, chicken run, amphitheatre and visitor centre as upgrades to the compound that were not related to security and that Zuma must pay for. Early estimates suggest he will have to pay about $680,000.
“I wish to emphasise that I never knowingly or deliberately set out to violate the constitution,” Zuma said.
“Any action that has been found not to be in keeping with the constitution happened because of a different approach and different legal advice,” he said, before issuing an apology for the “frustration and confusion” caused by the scandal.
Zuma, who has an earthy manner and can be combative in the political arena, looked shaken at times and his tone throughout was sombre.
It was a sharp contrast to his past utterances on the issue, including one in parliament where he mocked the way non-Zulu members of the house pronounced “Nkandla.”
Opposition parties, who have been calling for the 73-year-old to resign, dismissed his remarks.
“The president is misleading South Africa. He said repeatedly he always wanted to pay. He never wanted to pay,” Democratic Alliance leader Mmusi Maimane told Reuters after the televised address.
Analysts were also unimpressed.
“It’s a gutless whitewash. And it was an opportunity missed to take the country into his confidence and say I messed up and this is how we are going to deal with it,” said Gary van Staden, political analyst at NKC African Economics.
“It also means the politics of this will drag on, which is not good for the country because it means a period of uncertainty that we don’t need,” he said.
The opposition has launched impeachment proceedings against Zuma but these are unlikely to be successful because of the ANC’s strong majority in parliament.
However, some South Africans believe the scandal could still bring Zuma down by persuading some in the ANC, which has run South Africa since the end of apartheid in 1994, to abandon him.
