Dear Editor,
I write to address the recent fiasco in West Indies cricket. I picked up that something had gone wrong as I listened to a popular Jamaican sport programme. The callers seemed very upset with something Darren Bravo had said, and one caller even suggested that he should never play for the West Indies again. While I cannot comment on what transpired for the entire programme, at no time did I hear anyone speak out against Mr Cameron’s stewardship of the WICB. As for me, I have more faith in President elect Trump than Mr Cameron. Bravo reached his breaking point, and the rest is history.
Of course he was out of line, and should be punished. He should pay a hefty fine, but I don’t think sending him home was necessarily the right call. Of course if that’s what his contract states is the appropriate punishment, then so be it.
I wish to make a few points in support of Bravo. I use Marlon Samuels as a point of comparison.
According to Mr Cameron, Samuels was given a ‘B’ contract, while Bravo got a ‘C’ contract. Cameron has tried to support Bravo’s demotion with a specious argument which does not stand up to basic statistical analysis.
- Over the last 3 years, Bravo’s average in Tests fell from 37.5 (2014) to 31.78(2016). A 15% decline. Samuels’ average for the same period fell from 30.2 to 23. A 23% decline.
- Over the last 3 years, Bravo’s average in ODIs remained basically level, ie, 31 (2014) to 31.2 (2016). Samuels, who clearly prefers the shorter formats than Bravo, saw his average fall from 101 to 37.4, a 63% decline. Since he played only 5 ODIs in 2014, let’s exclude that year and start with 2015 instead. From 2015 to 2016 his average fell from 46.23 to 37.4, that is a decline of 16%. For the same period, Bravo’s ODI average increased from 28 to 31.2.
- Bravo has made clear that he wishes to focus on Test cricket, while Samuels has been considering retirement. I was surprised to see him in whites against Pakistan. Further, I was under the impression that these retainers were especially geared towards ‘retaining’ a nucleus of players who are primarily interested in Test Cricket.
- Mr Cameron misspoke about Bravo having an ‘A’ contract at some point.
So Mr Cameron is telling us, that a senior batsman who did well for us against Pakistan outside the Caribbean, just a few weeks ago, will be given a ‘C’ contract, while another batsman who seems not very interested in Test cricket, had a mediocre tour of Pakistan, and has seen a worse average decline than Bravo, was given a ‘B’ contract. Am I missing something here? If not, what a slap in the face for Bravo. What a slap in the face for the ordinary fan. What disrespect to our intelligence.
I agree Bravo’s average fell. But how can any player do well in the environment that Mr Cameron and his colleagues have created and continue to perpetrate upon WI cricket? I agree, the WICB has been making some good moves to better WI cricket, but surely, surely they can treat our heroes better than they have been doing.
Yours faithfully,
Samuel Braithwaite
