Dear Editor,
A press release purportedly coming from the office of the Prime Minister (PM) which was published in three of the daily newspapers on January 31, concerned the relative increases in salaries of the presidents, ministers and public servants over the years 1998 to 2014.
Firstly, if it is true that the salary increases given by the PPP/C were according to the Prime Minister “unconscionable and disgraceful” then the Prime Minister who has now positioned himself as an arbiter of fairness and holds himself out as the epitome of decency, should have refused the increase on an already high salary in 2015, granted by the Granger government to the newly elected ministers in accordance with the Prime Minister’s words, “unconscionable and disgraceful”.
The question then needs to be asked, what adjectives will best describe the huge salary increases that the APNU+AFC government gave themselves four months after being in office ‒ indecent, reckless, hypocritical and even deceptive ‒ especially when this was disclosed by the media, and subsequently discovered to be secretly done and then gazetted.
This matter was debated in the Parliament with the opposition calling for an annulment of the order granting the increases to the President, Prime Minister, Vice Presidents, Ministers and Junior Ministers, some 28 in number. This unpalatable situation continues to fester and haunt the David Granger led administration with even their members and supporters crying out against this betrayal of trust. Obviously this unpopular decision has resulted in the APNU+AFC government resorting to propaganda and in an act of desperation stage-managed the question by Mr Jermaine Figueira and the answer by Minister of Finance Winston Jordan, was opportunistically used by the Prime Minister with speedy orchestrated response.
In 1999 and 2000 the Armstrong tribunal recommendations were adopted and public servants received increases of 31.06% and 26.66% respectively. Minister Jordan’s answer in Parliament disclosed that the Jagdeo government did not bureaucratically grab the opportunity to increase their salary similar to that given to public servants. In essence neither the President nor the ministers in the Jagdeo government were provided with similar increases enjoyed by public servants for that year. In the same answer Minister Jordan revealed that in no less than three occasions the President and/or ministers were not given any salary increases whatsoever.
The Minister of Finance in his answer said that the President’s salary was indexed in 2006 to that of the Chancellor of the Judiciary and the Attorney General. The ministers’ salary was indexed to that of permanent secretaries, although the records would show that the salary of some permanent secretaries (OP& MOF) remains far in excess of the remuneration received by cabinet ministers.
The clear case in point, is that the PPP/C took office in 1992 and it was not until 14 years later after we would have developed Guyana; repaired infrastructure; achieved debt relief; stabilized the economy; fixed health and education services; improved the disposable income of the ordinary man; expanded the middle class; made significant investments in the development of the rural and hinterland communities; implemented policies for the revitalisation of the private sector; making Guyana attractive for investment and the overall improvement in the standard of living of all Guyanese before correcting what can be considered an anomaly. By this time our budget recurrent expenditure reflected a commitment to pro-poor expenditure to almost 60%.
It is important to note there was no public outcry, there was no public rebuke, and there was no secrecy in relation to the PPP/C salary increases. This was gazetted, publicly known and not handled in an underhand and devious manner. The people saw a government prioritising taking care of the interests of the masses.
I conclude by saying this, the APNU+AFC government in its misconstrued beliefs about its messianic stature or more aptly its manifest destiny, will continue to operate as if it is ‘anointed’ to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants, to whomever it wants and no one dares question it.
Yours faithfully,
Bishop Juan Edghill
