Dear Editor,
Recent documented information, available to me, indicated that on the 8th day of June 2018, the CEO, Dr. Lowell Porter, of the Small Business Bureau indicated that the previously advertised expression of interest (EOI) for training services was aborted.
An email from Dr. Porter to 14 companies that submitted proposals reads as follow:
“Dear All,
Please be advised that the captioned project with deadline June 8, 2018 has been aborted. We therefore ask that you do not submit a proposal at this time.
You will be advised of the SBB email address to send training proposals to at a later date, should we send out another EOI.
We apologize for any inconvenience that this might have caused and use this opportunity to thank you for your time, efforts and interest in working with the SBB.
We wish you continued success in all your business endeavours.”
Editor, on the 11th day of December 2018, Dr. Porter, wrote to the Chairman of the National Procurement and Tender Administration Board (NPTAB), Berkley Wickham, for approval to contract and pay Management Options Inc., Empretec and Cerulean for the supply of training services in the sum of $2,400,000.
By letter dated the 21st December 2018, the Chairman of NPTAB gave to Dr. Porter approval for the contract of training of participants in Region Four. The companies who were awarded the contract are: Management Options Inc., Empretec and Cerulean at a sum of $750,000, $750,000 and $900,000, respectively.
Editor, of note is the fact that initially a total of 14 companies submitted proposals for this contract.
This highly suspicious and irregular procurement activity is further compounded by a document from the Training and Development Officer to the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Business, through Dr. Porter on the 28th November 2018, requesting the sum of $7, 575, 000 for payment to Management Options Inc., the sum of $3,000,000 for payment to Empretec and the sum of $1,800,000 for payment to Cerulean for training services to be conducted in December 2018.
Editor, there are a number of issues that the Small Business Bureau must address. These are:
1. Provide proof, publicly, that after annulling the EOI based on the email adumbrated above, that the 14 companies were all approached to resubmit proposals for this contract;
2. Provide publicly, the evaluation report for the 3 contracts;
3 How is it that a request for payment was made even before the contracts were awarded by NPTAB?
4. Since we have also seen invoices for payment, which shows that training took place on the 29th and the 31st of December 2018, can the Small Business Bureau provide evidence that this training was actually conducted?
Notably, the awards of the contracts were for training in Region 4, however, the companies submitted invoices for training, which was conducted in Regions 5 and 6.
I have since learnt that one of the key technical personnel of this agency has been relieved of their duties. What is going on here?
Yours faithfully,
Bishop Juan A. Edghill
PPP/C Member of Parliament
