Dear Editor,
Guyanese, it is imperative that we scrutinise the actions of Aubrey Norton within the context of political leadership and democratic principles. During the tenure of David Granger as Leader of the PNCR, Aubrey Norton demonstrated his commitment to democracy and the strict adherence to our party’s constitution. He along with many others, Volda Lawrence included, embarked on a journey across Guyana, engaging with the party’s membership, and advocating for the holding of a Congress. This was not merely a whimsical endeavour; it was a principled stance in favour of democratic values.
At that time, Norton recognized the importance of internal party democracy and the need for the PNCR to follow its constitutional provisions. He knew that no political organization can thrive without regular and transparent mechanisms for leadership selection. Therefore, it is only fair to question whether the Aubrey Norton we see today, seemingly reluctant to uphold the very principles he championed in the past, is still the same staunch advocate for democracy.
Moreover, Aubrey Norton was not a passive observer during his involvement in the Central Executive Committee (CEC) that endorsed the December Congress which ultimately led to his own election. It was a conscious choice to prioritize party democracy and adherence to our constitution over political maneuvering.
However, it is baffling that in 2021, amidst the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, Aubrey Norton was a vocal supporter of holding a Congress in December 2021, without any consideration for August 2022. Yet now, in 2023, when conditions have clearly improved, he appears to be hesitant for a December congress. Is this not a perplexing change of heart? Does it not raise questions about his true intentions?
We must ponder whether Aubrey Norton is attempting to mislead the membership of the PNCR. Is he genuinely committed to the principles of democracy and constitutional adherence, or is he playing a duplicitous game for personal gain? The PNCR deserves a leader who is unwavering in their commitment to democratic values, one who does not waver in their conviction based on political convenience.
Where are the likes of Hamilton Green, Mavis Benn, Jeffrey Thomas, Alan Monroe, Cheryl Sampson, Mortimer Mingo, Volda Lawrence, Oscar Clarke, Amna Ally, Robert Corbin, Vincent Alexander, Carl Greenidge, Ronald Austin (Snr), Clement Corlette, Sherwood Lowe, Ambassador David Hales, Rawle Lucas and all others who pride themselves as proud PNCR and upholders of democracy and democratic constitutional practices?
In conclusion, it is essential for the members of the PNCR to hold Aubrey Norton accountable for his actions and statements. The principles of democracy and adherence to our constitution should not be compromised for the sake of expediency. Aubrey Norton’s past advocacy for a Congress, even during challenging times, raises valid concerns about his current position. The membership must ask: Is Aubrey Norton for real, or is he merely playing politics with the future of our party? The answer to this question will determine the course of our party’s democratic journey.
Sincerely yours,
Norman Browne
Social and Political Activist