Dear Editor,
Well, it seems the authorities have finally come to the realisation that some structures on the seawall, within the vending space, are immobile, immoveable, permanent structures in violation of the contract terms and conditions. These structures did not grow roots and materialise overnight. Some have been there for quite a while. This had to be known. The question remains why were the breaches of contract allowed to fester and become unlawful to the point where demolition is now the course of action? Why the strict enforcement of contract terms was not done when these vendors were expanding and making, what should have been a temporary, mobile arrangement, permanent? Where was the oversight, monitoring body? True, the aesthetics of the area needs to be improved and contract terms must be adhered to, but, on the other hand, hard investments must be considered too in striking a balance. It is hoped a mutually agreeable arrangement can be arrived at which will benefit all parties involved.
Sincerely,
Shamshun Mohamed
