Dear Editor,
I would like to address the recent letter by Jhagroo Persaud advocating for more accessible firearm ownership in Guyana. The assertion that “in most countries of the world, it is a fundamental right of citizens to have the ability to bear arms” is not accurate. In fact, the right to bear arms is explicitly enshrined in the constitution of only a few countries, with the United States being the most notable example.
In many other countries, firearm ownership is heavily regulated and considered a privilege rather than an inherent right. For instance, nations such as the United Kingdom, Japan, and Australia have stringent gun control laws that significantly restrict civilian access to firearms. These countries have seen low rates of gun-related violence as a result of their strict regulations.
The idea that more guns lead to less crime is also debatable. Studies have shown mixed results, with many indicating that increased firearm availability can actually lead to higher rates of gun violence and accidents. Ensuring public safety through widespread firearm ownership may not be the most effective approach.
Instead, a focus on strengthening the capacity and effectiveness of the Guyana Police Force, improving community policing, and addressing the root causes of crime could be more beneficial strategies. Firearms should not be made readily accessible to any and every one, as this can lead to unintended and potentially tragic consequences.
If we truly care about the safety and well-being of our business community and citizens at large, we should advocate for comprehensive crime prevention strategies rather than increased firearm ownership.
Sincerely,
Shawn Duggin
