No significant correlation observed between Banks DIH’s profitability and volume of shares traded

Dear Editor,

A recent article in the SN noted that “Banks DIH Limited, a blue-chip company on the domestic scene, has asked the Securities Council of Guyana to suspend the trading of its shares on the Guyana Stock Exchange.” I am writing to address a notable observation in the performance of Banks DIH Limited shares traded on the Guyana Stock Exchange Inc.

Despite the company’s robust profitability over the last several reported fiscal years, there appears to be no significant correlation with the volume of shares traded. From a finance and economics perspective, several factors contribute to this phenomenon, which merits a deeper analysis.  Firstly, market efficiency plays a crucial role. The Guyana Stock Exchange is relatively nascent, and less liquid compared to more established markets. This limited liquidity can lead to fewer trades, regardless of a company’s profitability. Investors might hold onto shares for longer periods, reducing trading volumes.

Moreover, the limited number of active investors and lower levels of speculative trading on the Guyana Stock Exchange can result in less price movement and trading volume, even if the company is performing well financially. Secondly, information asymmetry and investor

behaviour significantly impact trading volumes. While Banks DIH Limited’s financial health may be evident in their reported profits, the dissemination and perception of this information among investors can vary. Many local investors might not have access to the same level of detailed financial analysis or may not respond to financial performance with immediate trading actions. This lag in response can decouple profitability from trading activity.

Additionally, the influence of external economic factors cannot be ignored. Macroeconomic conditions, such as changes in interest rates, inflation, and foreign exchange rates, can overshadow company-specific performance. Investors may prioritize these broader economic indicators over individual company metrics, affecting their trading decisions irrespective of Banks DIH Limited’s profitability. Furthermore, the investor base in Guyana might be more conservative, with a tendency towards long-term investment rather than frequent trading. Cultural and economic factors influence this behaviour, leading to less reactive trading in response to quarterly or annual profit reports.

Finally, regulatory and structural aspects of the Guyana Stock Exchange itself can influence trading volumes. Restrictions on foreign investment, reporting standards, and trading mechanisms can all contribute to lower levels of activity. Even with profitable performance, these structural factors can inhibit a direct correlation with share trading volumes. In conclusion, while Banks DIH Limited’s profitability is a critical indicator of its financial health, several extrinsic factors within the Guyana Stock Exchange and the broader economic environment contribute to the observed lack of correlation with trading volumes. Understanding these dynamics are essential for investors and policymakers to foster a more vibrant and responsive stock market in Guyana.

Sincerely,

Keith Bernard