Dear Editor,
Please allow me to thank Mr. Ruel Johnson for the courtesy of his comments. I would simply say that Facts speak for themselves. First, is there meaningful consultation with the Opposition, and are Parliamentary Committees functioning as intended? Second, have there been documented reports by impartial authorities about mismanagement in some government departments and authorities? Third, has the Leader of the PPP commented publicly that there is need for vigilance against corruption in the procurement process? And who should take responsibility for these facts, if not the government of the day?
Then, on the point of intent, one can be convicted of manslaughter even if one did not intend to kill but was negligent in causing death. Or one can be convicted of causing death by dangerous driving even if one did not intend to kill. The facts and the consequences are what count. Autocratic effects can be felt by the populace even if not intended by the authorities. Whether it is intentional or not is a matter for discussion. Facts speak for themselves; and the law is clear on responsibility for unintended consequences.
Sincerely,
Bertrand Ramcharan
