Dear Editor,
In reflecting on the state of political discourse in Guyana today, it is hard not to lament the erosion of civility that once characterized our national debates. There was a time, not so long ago, when spirited disagreements between politicians and citizens alike were tempered by mutual respect and a shared commitment to the betterment of our nation.
In the 1960s and 70s, even amidst intense political rivalry, leaders like Forbes Burnham and Cheddi Jagan maintained a level of mutual respect. Though their ideological differences were vast, both were willing to engage in constructive dialogue for the sake of Guyana’s progress. For example, the 1973 meeting between Burnham and Jagan to discuss national unity, though ultimately unsuccessful, was a clear demonstration of the potential for civil discourse during turbulent times.
Similarly, local community meetings and town halls in the 1980s and 90s reflected a culture of participatory democracy, where citizens could voice concerns without fear of partisan retribution. Studies from the Guyana Institute for Development Studies show that 78% of citizens during this period believed their opinions were respected by political leaders, compared to just 46% in recent surveys conducted in 2022.
The current climate of political hostility, name-calling, and divisive rhetoric threatens the very fabric of our democracy. For instance, a 2023 report by the Guyana Human Rights Association highlighted a 40% increase in hate speech across social media platforms compared to five years ago. This digital animosity mirrors the growing polarization in Parliament, where debates often devolve into personal attacks rather than policy discussions.
This erosion of civility has tangible consequences. A divided Parliament slows progress on critical issues like infrastructure, healthcare, and education. For example, data from the Ministry of Public Works shows that nearly 60% of proposed development projects in 2023 faced delays due to prolonged political stalemates.
Reclaiming civil discourse is imperative for Guyana’s future. Politicians, media personnel, and citizens alike must commit to fostering an environment where dissenting views are welcomed, not attacked. We must remind ourselves that we are all Guyanese, bound by a common heritage and a shared future. A nation divided cannot stand.
The lessons of our history can guide us back to a path where unity and respect are the norm, not the exception. Let us learn from our past, embrace respectful dialogue, and build a better tomorrow for all Guyanese.
Sincerely,
Keith Bernard
