Give special attention to our Indigenous Peoples and hinterland residents as this border controversy unfolds

Dear Editor,

As a political activist and member of the Indigenous Guyanese community, I have been constrained to follow with careful attention developments in the critical matter of the Guyana/Venezuela border controversy. Accordingly, I have been encouraged by a number of developments especially by the fact that both the Opposition and the Government hammered out a national position premised on the unity of our people in October last year.

The various countries, large and small, and international organisations which have come forward to support our cause is comforting. The national position on the Border Controversy and the support gained for Guyana are a source of comfort and hope. This Controversy constitutes an existential threat to my country as a whole and sovereign State. Only a united people can come through a danger of this type. This means that every segment of the population must feel itself to be a valued member of the exercise to combat the steadily increasing Venezuelan aggression.

But I am sure that unity can be improved and strengthened if we look carefully at the position of all of our people in relation to the Border Controversy. For let us be frank, there are  problems with our “unified position.”  To be specific we need to look carefully at those communities which border the Bolivarian Repub-lic of Venezuela. I refer specifically to the Titled Indigenous Villages and other communities in Regions 1,7,8 and 9. Consider also, Region 2 which is easily accessible from Venezuela via the Atlantic and the Pomeroon River. These communities face directly the discomfort of the decisions taken by Maduro and his regime, including the necessity to move from one region to another.

 The problem here is that the lack of the appropriate and logistical infrastructure has hampered leaders in these Villages and communities from bringing certainty to the support that they  can expect and give to residents. Not so long ago there was what was called a Regional Policy which enabled them to provide information to the central government and receive guidance and instructions as to how they should respond to the activities of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela which are injurious to the territorial integrity and sovereignty of our nation. It is matter of regret that the Border Policy which proved so effective in the past has been abandoned. I must urge the government to urgently revive this policy. Government must also ensure that matters affecting Guyana’s hinterland and Indigenous Peoples’ population in relation to the Border Contro-versy must be communicated to them in the First Language(s) wherever necessary.

Developments in Venezuela since the Referendum laying claim to the Essequibo, the law formalizing the idea of “Guyana Essequiba,” the threat of elections to elect a Governor of this entity, the military buildup on Ankoko Island, and the building of the bridge joining the island to the main land of Venezuela, and, finally, the relentless propaganda against my country by Caracas have all unsettled my compatriots but especially those in the Indigenous Villages and  communities on,  or near, the frontier. For example, after the launch of a series of measures in December, our Indigenous Villages and communities were pervaded by fear and apprehension. The publication “Monga-bay”reported in December that these developments prompted fears “among dozens of Amerindian communities that the conflict may threaten ongoing efforts to legally recognize their collective territorial lands or undermine their land titles in the Amazon region.” Now the land is critical to the identity and well-being of the Indigenous Peoples and therefore, the fears they are expressing ought to attract the immediate attention of the central government. It is past time, therefore, that the Esse-quibo region is given its own development plan allied to a Security Regime which can protect these communities and maintain the territorial integrity and sovereignty of our country. We have the resources and it is certainly not beyond our doing. Indeed, it is ironic that the county which is the source of most of our natural resource wealth, protected forests and fresh water is given the least of the resources derived therefrom,  for its defence and well-being. This county is also home to the largest block of Guyana’s Indigenous Peoples population. This obviously explains the protected forests, minerals, and remaining freshwater sources. I am sure, we can get the required technical assistance from friendly countries to complete a programme for the defence and economic development of our Essequibo.

The apparent lack of vigour of the Government in responding to the provocations of the Venezuelan government is, to say the least, troubling. Why has the Government not gone on the diplomatic offensive? We have done this with great success in the eighties, for example, and the paradigm exists for this Government to follow. It is clear that we will not get much out of the Security Council where Venezuela has staunch supporters in the Russians and the Chinese. But what about the General Assembly? After sixty years of independence we must know how to organize ourselves within this organ in order to ensure a robust defence of our territorial integrity and sovereignty in a Global environment. It should not be difficult for this country, given its wide diplomatic networks, to mobilise those international organizations which support Indigenous Peoples, including The International Group for Indigenous Affairs ( IWGIA).  It is necessary to dramatize to the peoples and Governments of the world that the decisions and actions taken by the Venezuelan Government in relation to the Border Controversy with Guyana are having a deleterious effect on the livelihood, wellbeing, and cultural autonomy of the Indigenous peoples of my country. Of course, such a course of action must be premised on the convening of a special conference of Guyana’s Indigenous Peoples at which appropriate resolutions can be passed, action recommended and taken.  Above all, practical action outlined, which can assist these Villages and communities to respond to the ongoing tension and uncertainties in the regions adjoining (and easily accessible by) Venezuela. A robust and intelligent diplomacy will have a positive impact on our hinterland and Indigenous Villages and communities.

I want to urge the Government as the drama of the Border Controversy unfolds to give special attention and support to our Indigenous Peoples and hinterland residents, so that they do not feel trapped in a zone of existence where they are subject to the propaganda and blandishments of the Maduro administration without countervailing action from our Government. Time is not on our side.

Sincerely,

Mervyn Williams,

Former Member of Parliament.