Opinion

Citizens have no facts on the Jagdeo/Ferguson libel case

Dear Editor, I refer to your paper’s lead story titled: “Appeal court rejects Jagdeo’s latest bid to avoid paying judgment to Ferguson – damages to be set at new hearing” (SN Sept 5th) – and wish to comment as follows: This case is about information Jagdeo might have received in 2019 and something he might have said relating to Minister Ferguson allegedly receiving property improperly.

Today's Paper

The ePaper edition, on the Web & in stores for Android, iPhone & iPad.

Included free with your web subscription. Learn more.